Rick Santorum's Anti-Abortion Politics Would Have Killed His Own Wife
Let’s get down to brass tacks: Presidential candidate Rick Santorum, Personhood Pledge-signing, Griswold vs. Connecticut-opposing, Mr. Ban Abortion in All Circumstances With No Exception for the Life of the Mother, believes that the actions of his own wife should be treated as criminal. Why? Because, back in 1996, his wife had a procedure that resulted in the deliberate death of her fetus, even though it was a matter of saving her own life.
Karen Santorum’s difficult pregnancy and resultant life-saving, induced early delivery is no secret; in a 2004 interview with NPR’s Terry Gross, her husband characterized the 1996 procedure as a harrowing but necessary. Karen, in her 19th week of pregnancy, received a risky surgery to save a pregnancy that doctors thought had little chance of survival. After the surgery, she came down with an infection, and doctors told Rick that unless the source of the infection — the fetus — was removed, his wife would die and his already-born children would be motherless. The doctor also told Santorum that his wife’s fetus would not survive outside of the womb. According to Santorum, Karen went into labor as a result of the antibiotics, and then doctors gave her a drug that further induced labor. She delivered, and unfortunately the doctors were right.
Shortly after Santorum first talked to the press about his wife’s pregnancy and their subsequent loss, rumors began circulating that Karen had actually had an abortion rather than induced delivery. Our Silver Ribbon goes so far as to assert that Karen Santorum did, in fact, have a second-trimester abortion.
But whether or not Karen Santorum had an abortion or medically induced the birth of a non-viable fetus shouldn’t matter in the eyes of someone with views as extreme as Santorum, as he is one of a disturbingly large group of politicians who believe that women should not be allowed to abort under any circumstances. Santorum’s even against abortion if there were no hope of the fetus surviving to full term, or even if the woman carrying the fetus risked death doing so. Karen Santorum would have died if the fetus were not removed, and labor was induced and not halted knowing that the fetus would not survive. How is this not technically “abortion?” In Santorum’s world, it would probably qualify as infanticide.
(via viviano)
Source: azspot
37 Notes/ Hide
-
abe-rombie liked this
-
pavlovsstepson reblogged this from azspot
-
resmc liked this
-
anotherword liked this
-
heylabodega liked this
-
sveppir liked this
-
mouthfulofchocolatedust liked this
-
crystalstarsinthesky reblogged this from fenix-jmj
-
riseaboveittoloveitletitgo reblogged this from azspot
-
riseaboveittoloveitletitgo liked this
-
therewillbemike liked this
-
randomactsofchaos liked this
-
randomactsofchaos reblogged this from azspot
-
awisefool reblogged this from lucille--bluth
-
jjarichardson reblogged this from azspot
-
localcreature reblogged this from azspot
-
fenix-jmj reblogged this from viviano
-
viviano reblogged this from azspot
-
hman liked this
-
lukehackney reblogged this from azspot
-
section9 liked this
-
noraleah liked this
-
dreams-from-my-father liked this
-
classyontheinternet liked this
-
iggymogo liked this
-
redcloud liked this
-
sarahlee310 liked this
-
lucille--bluth reblogged this from azspot and added:
isn’t this always how it goes though? the most ardent pro-life supporters use the services when they need them and the...
-
sp-a-m liked this
-
hairtrending reblogged this from azspot
-
azspot posted this